Contact Risa
Nakase-Thompson , PhD, Methodist Rehabilitation Center at
Citation Nakase-Thompson, R.
(2004). The Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test. The Center
for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/
combi/mast ( accessed
).
MAST
Properties
Several
aspects of psychometric properties have been investigated with the
MAST. Among a mixed sample of 51 patients with diagnoses including
traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, tumor, and encephalopathy,
individuals with left-hemisphere lesions performed significantly
worse on the Total Score, Receptive Index, and Expressive Index
of the MAST compared to individuals with right-hemisphere lesions
(Nakase-Thompson et al., 2002). Similar findings were reported among
a sample of 38 acute left hemisphere stroke patients (LH), 21 acute
right-hemisphere stroke patients (RH), and 36 normal control subjects
(CS; Nakase-Thompson et al., manuscript under preparationa). Individuals
in the LH group performed significantly worse on the Index and Total
scores compared to individuals in the RH and CS groups (p<0.0005
for all). Inspection of subscale scores revealed that the LH group
performed worse on all subscale scores, Index, and Total scores
compared to individuals in the CS. Similar significance was found
comparing the LH and RH group with the exception that the Object
Recognition and Verbal Fluency subscales did not discriminate these
two clinical groups. These two studies suggest excellent criterion
validity for the MAST in differentiating communication impairments
among both clinical and control samples.
Aspects
of convergent and divergent validity were investigated with the
MAST in a sample of 33 individuals with traumatic brain injury,
stroke, dementia, and encephalopathy (Nakase-Thompson et al., 2003).
Using non-parametric correlations, the MAST Total score was found
to be significantly correlated with other language measures including
the Boston Naming Test (r=0.89), MAE Controlled Oral Word Association
Test (r=0.57), and MAE Token Test (r=0.79). Divergent validity of
the MAST was investigated by examining the relationship with the
Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) Total Score and Agitated Behavior
Scale. Correlations were not significant as expected (Nakase-Thompson
et al., 2003). However, given the relatively small sample size,
a follow-up investigation with a larger sample has established a
significant correlation between the MAST and MMSE which is a more
generalized measure of cognitive functioning and sensitive to language
impairments (Nakase-Thompson et al., manuscript in progress). In
this larger sample, the MAST maintained a significant correlation
with all language measures and the MMSE but did not correlate significantly
with a measure of visual-perception (Benton Visual Form Discrimination
Test).